Study: Sentencing guidelines ease discrimination

Publication: The Associated Press

Author: Larry O'Dell


05/22/2008 - State sentencing guidelines virtually erase discrimination in criminal punishments, regardless of how much judges are allowed to deviate from recommended prison terms, according to a study released Thursday.

The National Center for State Courts examined significantly different guidelines in three states: Virginia, where the guidelines are voluntary; Michigan, which offers some judicial discretion and Minnesota, which has the most mandatory system of the three.

The study concluded that the guidelines in each of those states result in consistent sentences that generally are not influenced by race and economic status. Wiping out racial discrimination was the major goal of a sentencing guidelines movement that began in the 1970s. ... The study by the nonprofit, Williamsburg, Va.-based NCSC was funded by the National Institute of Justice, the research arm of the U.S. Department of Justice. The report was financed by the Pew Charitable Trust's Center on the States.

Read the full article, Study: Sentencing guidelines ease discrimination, on the Chicago Tribune Web site.

E-alerts & Newsletter

Keep up to date with the latest election reform developments with electionline Weekly, our online newsletter, and our alerts service bringing you breaking news in the world of election reform.

Subscribe to News Feed

Pew Center on the States provides its content via RSS Feeds. We encourage you to subscribe to be immediately updated when content is added to this site.

Subscribe to News Feeds